Popularization of Science

Popularization of Science

Compilation of the Organizational Culture Paradigm Model of Elementary Teachers in Kermanshah Province

Authors
1 PhD student in Department of Educational Management, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Kermanshah Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kermanshah, Iran.
2 Associate Professor, Department of Educational Management, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Kermanshah Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kermanshah, Iran.
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Management, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Kermanshah Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kermanshah, Iran
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this research was to present the organizational culture model of elementary teachers in Kermanshah province.
Method: This work was done by conducting a qualitative research using the foundational data theory based on the systematic approach of Corbin and Strauss. To conduct field interviews, the statistical population of the research included educational management professors, managers and teachers of education in Kermanshah province, who had the necessary experience and knowledge regarding the subject of the research. 16 people (and 16 interviews) were selected as a sample by using purposeful sampling and reaching theoretical saturation. In order to collect data, in-depth and semi-structured interviews with experts and experts in the field of educational management were used, and each interview took between 45-60 minutes. The content validity was confirmed by using Lawshe's content validity coefficient. In the reliability of the interview with the within-theme agreement method between the researcher's coders, the reliability between the two coders was 83.87%. In order to analyze the data, NVIVO10 qualitative studies software was used.
Findings: Finally, 12 categories in the form of 6 dimensions of the paradigm model in the form of causal factors (2 categories), the main category: organizational culture (2 categories), strategies (2 categories), background conditions (2 categories), intervening conditions (2 categories), and consequences (2 categories) were placed.
Conclusion: By taking advantage of the causal conditions, intervening conditions and contextual conditions, by adopting strategies, it led to the results of the title.
Keywords
Subjects