Grassroots innovations and its indicators in Iran

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Associate Professor, National Research Institute for Science Policy (NRISP), ,Tehran,Iran

2 Phd in Educational Psychology,University of Tehran,Tehran,Iran.

Abstract

Grassroots innovations are informal, indigenous, and local solutions carried out by ordinary people with no experience in formal and organized sectors to solve problems. The aim of this paper was identifying grassroots innovations in Iran and developing related indicators.
It was a mixed method research with explanatory design; Therefore, the research was conducted in two parts: qualitative and quantitative. First, by examining the research literature in this field, the existing indicators for Grassroots innovations were extracted and approved by experts using the Delphi technique; then, based on these indicators, the questionnaire was designed. The validity of the questionnaire was confirmed by experts using the CVI index and then it was sent to officials in areas related to popular innovation in different provinces. Out of 213 questionnaires received, 116 were identified as Grassroots innovations based on the extracted indicators and were quantitatively analyzed. Findings in the quantitative part showed that in this study, the average age of popular innovators was 36 years, 15% of innovators were women and 85% were men. The highest number of participants in this study was related to the provinces of South Khorasan and Fars province. People with a bachelor's degree had the highest frequency. The areas of Grassroots innovations in this study were mostly in the technical field (37%), agriculture and animal husbandry (21%) and environment and art (12% each). In the qualitative stage, 21 Grassroots innovators were interviewed. Then, in order to qualitatively analyze the interviews and questionnaires, the Colaizai’s method was used and the findings showed that grassroots innovation in Iran in seven main themes including problem solving, environmental protection, being economical, applicability, government independence, availability and the use of technology is defined and these themes include sub-themes that were introduced as indicators of grassroots innovation in Iran. The findings of this section also confirmed the samples of the quantitative section.

Keywords

References

انتظاری، ی. (1399). اقتصاد توسعه دانش‌بنیان؛ توسعه به مثابه ساخت اکوسیستم‌های دانش‌بنیان. تهران: مؤسسه پژوهش و برنامه‌ریزی آموزش عالی.
رضوی، س.م.، اکبری، م.؛ جعفرزاده، م.، و زالی، م.ر.، (1392). بازکاوی روش تحقیق آمیخته. تهران: دانشگاه تهران.
مبینی دهکردی، ع. و کشتکارهرانکی، م.، (1394). نوآوری اجتماعی: کنکاشی بر مفهوم‌سازی مبتنی بر تحلیل محتوای تعاریف. مدیریت نوآوری، 4 (2)، 115-134.
محمدی، م.، طباطبائیان، س.ح. و دیگران (1392).  تحلیل مدل شکل‌گیری کارکردهای نظام نوآوری فناورانه نوظهور در ایران،  مطالعه موردی بخش نانو فناوری. فصلنامه سیاست علم و فناوری. 5 (4)، 34-19.
مرکز تحقیقات سیاست علمی کشور. (1395). کارگاه آموزشی شبکه نوآوری‌های مردمی. گروه ترویج علم، مرکز تحقیقات سیاست علمی کشور، 28-27 بهمن‌ماه 1395.         
            Ahmed, A., & Al-Roubaie, A. (2012). Building a knowledge-based economy in the Muslim world: The crical role of innovation and technological learning. World Journal of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development, 9(2), 76-98. doi: 10.1108/20425941211244243.
            Bhaduri, S. & Kumar, H. (2010). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivations to innovate: tracing the motivation of ‘grassroot’ innovators in India. Mind & Society, 10(1), 27-55. doi: 10.1007/s11299-010-0081-2.
            Bhaduri, S., & Kumar, H. (2009). Tracing the motivation to innovate: A study of grassroot innovators in India. Papers on economics and evolution, No. 0912.
Bhaduri, S & Kumar, H .(2011). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivations to innovate: tracing the motivations of ‘grassroots’ innovators in India. Mind and Society. 10 (1) 27-55.
Butkeviciene, E. (2009). Social innovations in rural communities: methodological frameworkand empirical evidence, Cambridge Mass: Social Sciences, 63, 80-88.
Bound, K & Thornton, I. (2012). Our Frugal Future: Lessons from India’s Innovation System. London: National Endowment for Science, Technology and the Arts. Available at: http://www .nesta.org.uk/publications/our-frugal-future-lessons-india%C2%92s-innovation-system.       Chesbrough, H., W. Vanhaverbeke& J. West, eds. (2006).Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm.Oxford: Oxford Press University.Cozzens,
Church, C. & Elster, J. (2002). The Quiet Revolution, Birmingham: Shell Better Britain.
Church, C. (2005). Sustainability: the importance of grassroots initiatives (Summary of Presentation ed.). London: Community Environment Associates.
            De Mello, L. & Dutz, M. A. (2012). Promoting Inclusive Growth: Challenges and Policies. OECD Publishing. doi.10.1787/9789264168305-en.
            Defra.(2003). Changing Patterns: UK Government Framework for Sustainable Production and conceptual study based on selected case studies from India. Working paper No. 70. Institute for Technology and Innovation Management, Hamburg :University of Technology, Consumption (London: DEFRA).
            Devi, W.P. & Kumar, H. (2018). Frugal Innovations and Actor-Network Theory: A case of Bamboo Shoots Processing in Manipur, India. European Journal of Development Research, 30(1), 66-83.
            Gupta, A. K. (2014). Theory of green grassroots frugal innovations. Anil Gupta’s Blog, 15 August 2014; http://anilg.sristi.org/theory-ofgreen- grassroots-frugalinnovations/
            Gupta, A.K. (2013). Tapping the Entrepreneurial Potential of Grassroots Innovation.. Innovation Review, Special Supplement on Innovation for a Complex World, Summer 2013, 18–20.
Hall,J., Matos, s.,Shcchan, L.,Silvestre, B.,(2012). Entrepreneurship and Innovation at the Base of the Pyramid: A Recipe for Inclusive Growth or Social Exclusion?, Journal of ManagementStudies,Volume 49, Issue 4, June 2012, PP. 785-812.
            Heeks, R. (2009). Where Next for ICTs and International Development?. In OECD/infoDev, ICT for Development: Improving Policy Coherence, Paris: OECD Publishing.
            Hess, D. (2007). Alternative Pathways in Science and Industry. Activism, Innovation and the Environment. Massachustts: The MIT Press.
            Hossain, M. (2016). Grassroots innovation: A systematic review of two decades of research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 137, 973-981.
                        Jain S (undated), The Poet’s Challenges to Schooling: Creative Freedom for the Human Soul.
            Kumar, H. (2014). Dynamic networks of grassroots innovators in India. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, 6(3), 193-201.
            Lehner, A.C. & Gausemeier, J. (2016). A pattern-based approach to the development of frugal innovations. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(3), 13-21. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/971.
            Mokyr, J. (1990). The lever of riches: Technological creativity and economic progress.
            Monaghan, A. (2009). Conceptual niche management of grassroots innovation for sustainability: the case of body disposal practices in the UK. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 76, 1026-1043.
            Muchie, M., Bhaduri,S., Baskaran A& Sheikh, F., (eds) (2015). Informal Sector Innovations: Insights from the Global South., Routledge, Taylor and Francis, UK.
            OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development). (2012b). Innovation and Inclusive Development: Conference Discussion Report, Cape Town, South Africa, 21 November 2012. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
            OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development). (2012a). Innovation for Development: A Discussion of the Issues and an Overview of the Work of the OECD Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
            OECD. (2010) .Social Entrepreneurship and Social Innovation, in: SMEs, Entrepreneurship and Innovation.
            Prahalad, C. K.(2005). The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid: Eradicating Poverty through Profits. Upper presented at STEPS Centre, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK, May 24. Press: Cape Town.
            Sahrma, G. & Kumar, H. (2018). Intellectual property rights and informal sector innovations: Exploring grassroots innovations in India. The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 21(3-4), 123-139.
            Sharma, G. & Kumar, H. (2019). Commercializing innovations from the informal economy: The grassroots innovation ecosystem in India. South Asian Journal of Business Studies, doi. 10.1108/SAJBS-12-2017-0142.
            Schumpeter, J. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development. Harvard University Press.
            Seyfang, G., Smith, A., )2007(. Grassroots innovations for sustainable development: towards a new research and policy agenda. Environmental Politics, 16, 584-603.
            Smith, A. (2005). The Alternative Technology Movement: An Analysis of its Framing and Negotiation of its. Framing and Negotiation of Technology Development. Human Ecology Review, 12(2), 107.
            Srinivas, S., & Sutz, J. (2008). Developing countries and innovation: searching for a new analytical approach. Technology in society, 30, 129-140.
            Subba Rao, S. (2006). Indigenous knowledge organization: an Indian scenario. International Journal of Information Management, 26, 224-233.
            Varma, R. (2001). People’s Science Movements and ScienceWars? Economic and Political Weekly, 36 (52): 4796-4802.
            Viswanathan, S. (1998). http://www.unc.edu/~aparicio/WAN/LibroWAN/VisvanathanFinal.doc (12-01-07)].
 

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics