Introduction of Impact Assessment in Rural Development Projects

Document Type : Review Paper

Authors

1 PHD student agricultural of development at Tehran University

2 Crossresponding, Professor, Department of Agricultural Economics and Development, University of Tehran.

Abstract

In the last few centuries and with the rapid growth of industry and technology in the world, rural development as an important aspect of national development is more important than the past, and the need for a systematic and sustainable approach to rural development, the process of evaluation of projects and programs It makes things natural and completely fundamental. Cardiac evaluation is consequential management. Impact assessment comes at a time when it comes to achieving its goals in a systematic and comprehensive framework, with tools provided. Therefore, the research is conducted using the logical framework approach of a project. Monitoring and post-marketing management implies the need to respond to changes in the surrounding environment and increase understanding of how the project is adapted to increase the likelihood of achieving desired outcomes. Proactive management has specific limitations for each project. An updated awareness of external and internal constraints will help managers and practitioners take realistic conceptions of improvements and adjustments to projects. In this paper, we have tried to review the concepts of evaluation, its approaches, its place and the importance of evaluation in rural development projects.
 

Keywords

References

ازکیا، مصطفی (1384)، جامعه شناسی توسعه­، تهران، کیهان.
حسین لو، حمید (1384)، ارزشیابی آموزش. خبرگزاری فارس، قابل دسترس با آدرس
www.farsnews.com/printable.php/nn=8410040411
رضوانی، محمد رضا (1380)، مقدمه­ای بر برنامه­ریزی توسعه روستایی در ایران­­، نشر قومس، تهران.
شریف زاده، ابوالقاسم؛ اسدی، علی و شریفی، مهنوش. (1390)، ارزشیابی پیامدگرا در فرایند توسعه پایدار. انتشارات جهاد دانشگاهی. واحد تهران.
عامری، محمود؛ عباسپور، مجید؛ کاظمی، روح الله و زاهد، فاطمه (1390)، ارائه الگویی جهت جلب مشارکت مردم در طرح­های توسعه پایدار، علوم و تکنولوژی محیط زیست، دوره 13، شماره2.صص 79-67.
کلینتون، آ و پتر، ا (1371)، نظام­ها نظارت برای پروژه­های توسعه کشاورزی و روستایی، مترجم: قدرت الله معمارزاده، فصلنامه روستا و توسعه، شماره 6، نشر وزارت جهاد سازندگی.
مجتهد، احمد؛ و حسن زاده، علی. (1380). پایش و ارزیابی طرح­های یکپارچه توسعه روستایی (مطالعه موردی حوزه آبریز حبله رود). اقتصاد کشاورزی و توسعه. 9 (36):73-42.
Alexander, Meredith (2001). Lee Cronbach, pioneer in education psychology, dead at 85. Stanford University News Service, Available: news/pr/01/cornbachbit1010.html.
Alkin,c. Marvin.(2011). Evalution essentionals  from A to Z. New York. The Guide Press.
Bruke, R. (1990). Project  Management-planing and control Technique, Third Edition.
Cook, D. Team (1996). Lessons learned in evalution over the past 25 years. In: Evalution for the 21st Century. A Handbook By: Chelimsky, W.R. Shadish. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Cronbach, l.J. (1963). Course improvement through evalution. Teacher College Record 64: 672-683.
FINAL DRAFT. (2008). Guidelines for Project and  Programs Evalutions. Development Coopretion. Austria.
Fitzpatrick. L.J., Sanders, R.J, & Worthen, R.B. (third Edi, 2004). Program evalution: Alternative approaches and practical guidelines. Pearson Education, Inc.
IBRD, (1981). A hand book on monitoring  and evalution of agriculture and rural development projects, DJ, Casley and D.A. Luy.
IFAD. (2002). International Fund for Agricultural Development, Via del Serafico, 107, 00142 Rome, Italy. http://www.ifad.org.
Kenzer, H. (1998). In scarch of Excellence in project Management. Van Nostrand  Reinhold.
Mathison,S.(2005). Encyclopendia of evalution. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.-
Mertens,M.D. (2010). Research and  evalution  in education and psyology. Sag Publication, Inc.-
Rao, c. (1989). The Impact of Rural Development Programmes on the Economic Structure of Rural Communities. The Balance between Industry and Agriculture in Economic Development, pp 97-109
Sedrakyan,­a; Campbell,B; Merino, J; Kuntz, R; Hirst,A; McCulloch,P.(2016). IDEAL-D: a rational framework for evaluating and regulating the use of medical devices.
Stake, Robert (1975). Program evalution particularly responsive evalution. Center for Instructional Research and curriculum Evalution Publishers, University of IIlinois at Urbon-Campaign.
Stenhouse,Lawrence. (1975). An introduction to curriculum research and development. Heinemann Educational Books Ltd, London.
Stufflebeam, D.L., & Shinkfield, A.J. (1985). Systematic  evalution. Boston, MA: Kluwer-Nijhiff.
Tyler, R.W. (1950). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press.
Vienna,M. (2009).Guidelines for Project and  Programs Evalutions. Development Coopretion. Austria.
Wholy, S. J, Harty, P. H,& Newcomer, E.N. (2010) .Planing and designing  useful  evalutions. In wholy, S.J, Harty, P.H& Newcomer, E.N, Handbook of practical program evalution. John Wiley& Sons.
World Bank( 1989). Guidelines for Project and Programs Evalutions. Development Coopretion.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics