Designing a formal and experienced curriculum model for the sixth grade elementary mathematics course

Document Type : Review Paper

Authors

1 Ph.D Student in Curriculum Planning, Department of Educational Sciences,Arak Branch,Islamic Azad University,Arak,Iran

2 Associate Professor , Department of Educational Sciences,Arak Branch,Islamic Azad University,Arak,Iran

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Sciences,Arak Branch,Islamic Azad University,Arak,Iran

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to design a formal and experienced curriculum model for sixth grade elementary mathematics course. In this study, through literature review and exploratory interview, to identify the components of formal and experienced curriculum for sixth grade elementary mathematics course through analysis The theme and content analysis method (analysis unit coding, categories and registration unit) were discussed. For field interviews, formal curriculum research participants include curriculum faculty members and math faculty members, top math instructors, math curriculum planners, and researchers in the field of curriculum planning education familiar with math and curriculum education. They were curricula, and in terms of the curriculum experienced, the community includes experienced and specialized teachers in the sixth grade of elementary school. To analyze the data, continuous comparison method was performed during three stages of open, axial and selective coding using MaxiCode software of Pro version. Data analysis showed that the components of the formal curriculum in both practical and rational dimensions include problem solving, creativity, activities, intellectual skills and comprehension and reasoning; And the components of the curriculum experienced in both theoretical and practical dimensions including problem solving approach, purposeful teaching, teaching principles, practical teaching, research-based teaching method, exploratory teaching method, teaching in departments, modern teaching method and method Teaching is motivating. The results of the present study can be a good guide for the planners of the sixth grade elementary mathematics curriculum to determine the educational topics.

Keywords


فتحی واجارگاه، کورش (1394). اصول و مفاهیم برنامه‌ریزی درسی، تهران: انتشارات بال.
ربیعی، مهدی؛ حاجی حسین نژاد، غلامرضا؛ عطاران، محمد؛ کیامنش، علیرضا؛ شبیری، سیدمحمد. (1399). طراحی و اعتباریابی الگوی مطلوب برنامه درسی درهم‌تنیده (تلفیقی) آموزش سواد بوم‌شناختی در دوره ابتدایی ایران، مطالعات برنامه درسی، 15(59)، 5 -30.
خاوری، سید عبدالله. (1388). رویکرد تلفیقی: راهبردی برای برنامه درسی مدارس امروز. مدارس کارآمد، 6: 77-75.
Ahmadi GA. (2001). Evaluate the consistency and coordination among the three programs have been planned, implemented and achieved a new program in elementary science education courses. Talim Tarbiyat J. 86:51-92.
Aoki TT. (2004), Curriculum in a new key, 1st Ed, New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Astuti, N. M. W., Werdhiana, I. K., & Wahyono, U. (2021). Impacts of direct disaster experience on teachers’ knowledge, attitudes and perceptions of disaster risk reduction curriculum implementation in Central Sulawesi, Indonesia. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 53: 101992.‏
Clemmons, A. W., Donovan, D. A., Theobald, E. J., & Crowe, A. J. (2022). Using the Intended–Enacted–Experienced Curriculum Model to Map the Vision and Change Core Competencies in Undergraduate Biology Programs and Courses. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 21(1), ar6.‏
Fathi Vajargah K. (2005). Autopsy of a model curriculum in the areas of research, the scope of the curriculum in the current situation and prospects. Tehran: Samt Publication. [Persian]
Golafshani, N. (2003). Understanding Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research. The Qualitative Report, 8(4): 597-607
Hewitt, Thomas, W. (2006). Understanding and Shaping Curriculum, Sage press, Inc.
Johnson, B. (1997). Examining the validity structure of qualitative research. Education, 118(3): 282-292.
Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: An Introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Maleki H. (2003) Curriculum (action). Mashhad: Payam-e-Andishe Publication.
McCormick, R., & Murphy, P. (1999). Curriculum: a focus on learning; International Companion of Education (pp. 204-234). London, Rout ledge.
McKernan, J. (2007). Curriculum and imagination: Process theory, pedagogy and action research. Routledge.
 Mehr-Mohammadi M. (2002). Curriculum: Views, approaches and perspectives. Mashhad: Astan-e-Ghods Publication. [Persian]
Neumann, A. (2011), Professing Passion: Emotion in the Scholarship of Professors at Research Universities, American Educational Research Journal, 43(3), 381–424.
Nursa'adah, E., Liliasari, L., & Mudzakir, A. (2020). Designing Learning Sequence Metalic Bonding Concept through Model of Educational Reconstruction Framework. Educhemia (Jurnal Kimia Dan Pendidikan), 5(2): 101-110.‏
Nyewusira, B. N., & Alex-Nmecha, J. C. (2020). Education Functionalism and Community-Based Development: Effect of the Nexus and Missing Link in Rumuekini Community.‏
Oliva, Peter, F. (2010). Developing curriculum, Pearson Education, Inc.
Patton, M. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc
Pinar, William, F. & Zhang, Hua (2015). Without experience is teacher development possible? Autobiography and Teacher Development in China: Subjectivity and Culture in Curriculum Reform.Palgrave Macmillan US.
Tapala, T. T., Van Niekerk, M. P., & Mentz, K. (2021). Curriculum leadership barriers experienced by heads of department: a look at South African secondary schools. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 24(6): 771-788.‏
Trinter, C. P., & Hughes, H. E. (2021). Teachers as curriculum designers: Inviting teachers into the productive struggle. RMLE Online, 44(3): 1-16.‏
Wahyudin, D., & Suwirta, A. (2020). Politics of Curriculum in the Educational System in Indonesia. Tawarikh, 11(2): 143-158.‏
Walker, Decker F. (2003). Fundamentals of curriculum: Passion and professionalism, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., 2nd Ed.