Practical Writing Guide Literature Review

Document Type : Review Paper

Author

MSc. Candidate in Information Management

Abstract

Literature review is one of the main processes in various researches and fields, and addressing it requires attention and knowledge of the theoretical foundations and how to write literature review. In order to write and collect resources, researchers need to make the discussion of research backgrounds their top priority. Therefore, the main purpose of this research is to describe and explain the theoretical foundations of literature review and how to search and collect resources from databases as well as write Less defects literature reviews and clear visual presentation there are different types of literature review for researchers. This study has been done by documentary method and different Persian and Latin sources and databases have been used for this research.The results show, despite the importance and position of literature reviews in research, and a lot of studies have been done about it around the world, but researchers still have problems with what the literature review is and how they can examine and how to write and implement resources, and as perhaps and should not have been considered and analyzed, to be able to practically guide researchers on how to write Literature review. Studies also show this, Some researchers are not familiar enough with the literature review and how to compile them, and most of the research is based on the theoretical foundations of literature review.

Keywords

References

افشار، ابراهیم (1388). نقص غرض در پیشینه­نویسی. کتاب ماه، 13 (3)، 28- 29.
عبدخدایی، زهرا؛ طیوری، امیر (1398). تفاوت­های مرور روایتی و مرور نظام‌مند. مجله آموزش در علوم پزشکی، 19 (18)، 168- 166.
خاکی، غلامرضا (1378). روش تحقیق با رویکردی به پایان­نامه­نویسی. تهران: درایت.
سهرابی، محمد رضا (1392). اصول نگارش مقالات مروری. پژوهنده، 18 (2)، 52- 56.
صادقی فسایی، سهیلا؛ عرفان‌منش، ایمان (1394). مبانی روش­شناختی پژوهش­های اسنادی در علوم اجتماعی. راهبرد فرهنگ، 8 (29)، 91- 61.
غلامی، محمد احمد؛ صفری­زاده میناب، معصومه (1399). ادبیات تحقیق و جایگاه آن در پژوهش کیفی. اولین کنفرانس ملی پژوهش­های کاربردی در فرایندهای تعلیم و تربیت، 1- 15.
فتاحی، رحمت­الله؛ پریرخ، مهری (1390). مرور نوشتارها و پیشینه پژوهش: راهنمای نگارش. تهران: نشر کتابدار.
هومن، حیدرعلی (1385). راهنمای عملی پژوهش کیفی. تهران: سازمان مطالعه و تدوین کتب علوم انسانی دانشگاه­ها (سمت).
 
وبلاگ ترجمیک (1399). چگونه یک مقاله مروری بنویسیم؟
https://tarjomic.com/blog/2020/07/29
Cisco, J. (2014). Teaching the literature review: A practical approach for college instructors. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 2 (2), 41-57.
 Dochy, F. (2006). A guide for writing scholarly articles or reviews for the Educational Research Review. Educational Research Review, 1- 21.
Efron, E. S., & Ravid, R. (2019). Writing the Literature Review a Practical Guide. The Guilford Press New York London.
Garrard, J. (2011). Health Sciences Literature Review Made Easy: The Matrix Method. Third Edition, Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC.
Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 26, 91- 108, Doi: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x.
James, K. L., Randall, N. P., & Haddaway, N. R. (2016). A methodology for systematic  mapping in environmental sciences. Environmental Evidence, 5 (7), 1- 13, Doi: 10.1186/s137  50-016-0059-6.   
Machi, L. A., & Mcevoy, B. T. (2016). The Literature Review Six Steps To Success. Three Edition, Corwin A Sage Publishing Company.
Papatheodorou, S. (2019). Umbrella reviews: what they are and why we need them. European Journal of Epidemiology, 1- 4, Doi.org/10.1007/s10654-019-00505-6.
Pham, M. T., Rajic, R., Greig, J. D., Sargeant, J. M., Papadopoulosa, A., & McEwena, S. A. (2014).  A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing
the consistency. Research Synthesis Methods, 5, 371- 385, Doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1123.
Rowley, J., & Slack, F. (2004). Conducting a Literature Review. Management Research News,  27 (6), 31-39.
Saxton, M. L. (1997). Reference service evaluation and meta-analysis: findings an methodolo gical issues. Library Quarterly, 67(3), 267–89, Doi: 10.1086/629952.
Seers, K. (2015). Qualitative systematic reviews: their importance for our understanding
of research relevant to pain. British Journal of Pain, 9 (1), 36- 40, Doi: 10.11177/204 9463714549777.
Whittemore, R., & Knafl, K. (2005). The integrative review: updated methodology. Advanced Nursing, 52(5), 546–553, Doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x.
Charles University Library of America. (2014). Systematic Reviews & Other Review Types: https://guides.temple.edu/c.php?g=78618&p=4156608

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics